Limelight (1952) 1080p YIFY Movie

Limelight (1952) 1080p

Limelight is a movie starring Charles Chaplin, Claire Bloom, and Nigel Bruce. A fading comedian and a suicidally despondent ballet dancer must look to each other to find meaning and hope in their lives.

IMDB: 8.12 Likes

  • Genre: Drama | Music
  • Quality: 1080p
  • Size: 2.63G
  • Resolution: / fps
  • Language: English
  • Run Time: 137
  • IMDB Rating: 8.1/10 
  • MPR: Normal
  • Peers/Seeds: 7 / 4

The Synopsis for Limelight (1952) 1080p

Chaplin's final American film tells the story of a fading music hall comedian's effort to help a despondent ballet dancer learn both to walk and feel confident about life again. The highlight of the film is the classic duet with Chaplin's only real artistic film comedy rival, Buster Keaton.

The Director and Players for Limelight (1952) 1080p

[Role:]Nigel Bruce
[Role:]Buster Keaton
[Role:]Claire Bloom
[Role:Director]Charles Chaplin
[Role:]Charles Chaplin

The Reviews for Limelight (1952) 1080p

Reviewed bytomtheactuaryVote: 10/10/10

Chaplin could do anything as well or better than anyone else in movies:acting, writing, directing, composing, producing, editing, evenchoreographing. He was world renown as a comedian, yet has placed some ofthe most poignant images on film that ever were. He was, even more thanthegreat Orson Welles, a sort of one man band.

He was as successful worldwide as anyone ever was in movies. Somehow inallthis, he got the idea that he had something worthwhile to say about lifeandart. Which he did with this film.. and I for one am extremelygrateful.

The subjects of alcoholism... depression... aging... the ficklerelationships of audiences and performers... these are all covered in afilmthat manages to fit in philosophical dialog, pantomime, dancing, andmusic.The multiple showings of the same comedy sequence (in a dream, in front ofan unappreciative audience, in front of a wildly appreciative audience)getsone to thinking about the lemming-like nature of people in a way thatsomeone like Chaplin would have had almost unique insightinto.

It may take a while to become accustomed to the odd pacing and cadence ofaChaplin movie; once you are, you find yourself in the middle of anartisticexperience like no other.

The music in this film is unusually haunting and deserving of the Academyaward it belatedly received. 10 out of 10.

The curious twilight of a comedian long since abdicated.Reviewed byHenryHextonEsqVote: 7/10

Even for a fellow well-versed in Chaplin's sound films, 'Limelight' proved an odd viewing experience upon my perusal of it.

Following on from 'The Great Dictator' and 'Monsieur Verdoux', Chaplin eschews his physical comedy for the most part, preferring to address 'big themes' and important issues. 'The Great Dictator', quite obviously tackles fascism and the demagoguery of a dictator: indeed pretty pertinent in 1940. 'Verdoux' is an interesting one-off in its inherent darkness; the material, concerning a mannered serial killer, is treated with more sobriety and a blacker touch than had hence been the case with Chaplin's films. There is a startling effectiveness to the last reels of that film, with Chaplin's theme of society forming the individual's behaviour being emphatically and eerily conveyed by his well-spoken character. 'Limelight' focuses on the gold mine that is Chaplin's career and the decline of his sort of comedy. It should be got out of the way first, that considering the possibilities this stirs in the mind, the result will likely disappoint. But that does not affect my view that this is a very interesting film and broadly a successful entertainment. It could be argued that 'The Great Dictator' is a finer insight into Chaplin's art; the masterful pantomime is more vividly on show, and is Hitler is not especially the evil figure we know him to be, but more the manipulative, balletic Chaplin, commanding our attention.

'Limelight' seems not to succeed in being a summation of Chaplin's career; perhaps as it distinctly lacks the raison d'être of his visual comedy. Okay, perhaps Calvero is a character based partly on other faded stars from the music hall tradition, but we are not convinced that this is quite the same Chaplin. Of course, this is bound to be the case: this is sound cinema, nearly twenty years after the tramp's final sunset-bound trot. But, here Chaplin's character talks incessantly and unrepentantly: quite the conversion for the silent clown. Unlike Laurel and Hardy, the adjustment to sound was never made in his original screen persona, so this truly will seem a different Chaplin to viewers. He pontificates in a somewhat lofty, generally admirable fashion; but it is the speech of a mannered, delicate, sentimental old English gentleman, and not a clown or philosopher. There are times his dialogue wades in some very interesting waters - such as that regarding his views on audiences and the rigors of performance - but often, too little of worth is said with too many words, in an overweening, self-satisfied manner.

Where the film really succeeds is in the way Chaplin does take on a sort of tragic grandeur towards the close - or more rightly a rather sad grace; a man out of time and out of sympathy with most the world has to offer. It seems he was lucky to obtain the services of Claire Bloom to play the ballerina, Tereza, as she invests a crucial part with genuine feeling and warm brittleness - a good contrast with Chaplin's slightly wearing charm and ghostly drifting through the film. His contribution in bringing Bloom to the screen is to be appreciated, as she went on to a most impressive career in many mediums. Indeed, Bloom is rather histrionic at times, but at least it adds some genuine zest to proceedings. That she carries off this role, that from the evidence we see, is so unlikely ? a young girl completely in the thrall of a curiously cold and verbose old man ? is a testament to her skill. She really conveys more of Chaplin's appeal than is perhaps warranted by what occurs in the film.

Touches like the visual flashbacks of Neville and Tereza's unspoken romance during her voice-over, narrating the story, really help the film. As do the inclusion of performance sequences early on, which are revealed to be in Calvero's subconscious. The second of those rather amused me, seeming atypically Chaplin in its bantering wordplay and slightly otherworldly air. The performing fleas routine is hardly vintage Chaplin (but pray remember, Calvero is a purely music hall performer, of pre-WW1 days) in its invention, but it is very precisely performed. I loved the little bits implying a wider tapestry: the drunken musical recitations by Calvero and a few friends in his flat, the reminiscing in a bar. It may not be a picture focused on the details of London life in the era, but tantalizing glimpses are given.

It is charming to see faces of old Hollywood, albeit briefly in this picture, that is so dominated by Chaplin's self-regard. Nigel Bruce is a splendid presence as ? you've guessed it ? a doddering, hapless old buffer with heart certainly in the desired place and dander constantly up. Buster Keaton adds some much needed comedic timing and experience to the film with his late appearance, performing with Chaplin in a decent final routine. He really outshines Chaplin, and it is a shame more isn't seen of his droll presence, far more tangible and concrete than the curiously elusive Chaplin is here.

Whatever one's thoughts on the film's comedy, it must be recognized that this is more of a winsome, self-absorbed melodrama than it is anything like a comedy. That it works is surely down to the strange historical interest of the film and its undeniable melancholic resonance. This is a Chaplin at the end of his tether, seemingly unwilling or unable to go back to being a comedian. The film is sad, invested with a grand decay and propped up by perhaps a more ?real' Chaplin than was ever seen in his days of silence. It simply should not work ? it is a portrait over-egged to some degree - but this is somehow remarkably compelling stuff. The picture all the more mourns what isn't there.

Rating: - *** ?/*****

Reviewed byJosé Luis Rivera Mendoza (jluis1984)Vote: 9/10/10

Charlie Chaplin was without a doubt one of the most important pioneersof film-making, and through his life he saw the development of thecinema and its progress. "Limelight" is probably not as well known asmost of his silent feature, but it is a very important film tounderstand the vivacious mind of this genius. It is a very personalfilm that showcases Chaplin's feelings about his own brand of comedyand how it slowly lost the public's attention as he grew older.

"Limelight" is the story of an old comedian named Calvero (Chaplin),who one morning discovers that his young neighbor Thereza (ClaireBloom) attempted to commit suicide. He decides to take care of her anddiscovers that she is a dancer; knowing that both share a passion forperforming he begins to cheer her up and prepares her to become a greatdancer while at the same time he remembers his past glories.

When one watches "Limelight" is impossible not to see the manyautobiographical aspects of the plot, as in many ways, Calverorepresents how Chaplin feels at the modernization of comedy on stage.Like Chaplin, Calvero also played the character of an optimist trampwho always saw the good side of life, and like Chaplin, Calvero facedmany times the urge to modernize his act. It's kind of frightening tothink about how much of Calvero's story could be based on Chaplin'sreal experiences as it is a sharp criticism (for its time) to the wayperformers are treated by both their managers and their public.

As the last of his "talkies" made in America, "Limelight" is done withall the power Chaplin still had (although the film would be banned asChaplin lost his power due to his political opinions) and it shows. Thestage performances of the characters are sublime and in Calvero'smemories Chaplin resurrects a way of comedy apparently dead by theearly 50s and makes it fresh. The Keaton/Chaplin duo is a classicmoment captured on film. However, "Limelight" is not a comedy in thestrict sense of the word. Those expecting a laugh-riot like "ModernTimes" or "The Great Dictator" will be disappointed, this is a verypersonal melodrama where Chaplin his emotions about his career.

The acting is very good, Chaplin may be more remembered for his partsin silent films, but he delivers his lines with ease and ability. Hisphysical comedy is superb and his overall performance is memorable(mainly because it feels as if he was playing himself). Claire Bloom isat times a bit too melodramatic for the movie's sake, but for the mostpart is very effective and makes a good counterpart to Chaplin'sCalvero. Among the supporting cast Nigel Bruce as always chews thescenery and Buster Keaton is simply fabulous in his small yet classicrole.

Probably "Limelight"'s main problem is its excess of melodrama, and itsat times, excessively preachy attitude. The fact that is not a comedymay turn off people not used to Chaplin's more serious side, as whilethe movie has its fair share of laughs, it is obvious that Chaplinwanted to be recognized as more than a mere clown. The movie's slowpace and rhythm also put it closer to the melodrama of the 40s than tothe image we are all used to see when we think of Chaplin.

Despite all this, "Limelight" stands as a testament of Chaplin'senormous talent, and while not very well-known, it is one of the finestfilms he ever did. Fans of his work will definitely enjoy this film andfans of Keaton will appreciate his small yet terrific scene. 9/10

Limelight (1952) 1080p Related Movies

Mission: Impossible - Fallout (2018) 1080p Poster

Mission: Impossible - Fallout (2018) 1080p

Spotlight on a Murderer (1961) Poster

Spotlight on a Murderer (1961)

Ant-Man and the Wasp (2018) 1080p Poster

Ant-Man and the Wasp (2018) 1080p

Black Panther (2018) 1080p Poster

Black Panther (2018) 1080p

Cherry Crush (2007) 1080p Poster

Cherry Crush (2007) 1080p

The Cakemaker (2017) Poster

The Cakemaker (2017)

Talea (2013) 1080p Poster

Talea (2013) 1080p

Incredibles 2 (2018) 1080p Poster

Incredibles 2 (2018) 1080p